No Help for Farm Bill From Miffed Kansans in the House

Few states are as identified with farming as Kansas. Among its nicknames are the “The Wheat State” and “American’s Bread Basket.” And Kansas’s lawmakers are quick to point out the importance of agriculture to the state’s economy.

But when a new five-year farm bill, which authorizes nearly $1 trillion in spending on farm and nutrition programs, came up for a vote in the House of Representatives on Wednesday, the entire Kansas congressional delegation voted against it.

It was the first time that all members of the state’s delegation has voted against a farm bill, according to a review of congressional votes by The New York Times dating from the 1950s.

For many farmers in Kansas, which is heavily dependent on agriculture â€" it ranks seventh in farm production â€" the vote was a surprise.

‘We were really disappointed that they didn’t vote with us,” said Steve Baccus, president of the Kansas Farm Bureau, which represents the state’s farmers. “There were lots of things that we didn’t like in the bill, but after suffering through the worst drought in 50 years in 2012 and with the 2008 farm bill expired, we supported getting something done.”

Mr. Baccus, a fourth-generation farmer from Minneapolis, Kan., who grows wheat, corn and soybeans, said his group tried to lobby the state’s congressional delegation in support of the bill, even if they were opposed to some of the provisions contained in it.

“We felt like this was the best shot of getting something passed in this political environment,” he said. “But I guess for many of them the cons outweighed the pros.”

In statements issued after the farm bill vote, members of the Kansas delegation, all Republicans, said that they supported farming and realized the importance of agriculture to the state, but that they could not get past the bill’s flaws.

For Representative Tim Huelskamp, a fifth-generation farmer who represents the state’s First Congressional District, which is top in the nation for agriculture products sold, it was spending on the food stamp program that was first on his lists of concerns.

“This program is in desperate need of reform, and yet this bill makes only nominal changes,” he said. “Instead of status quo in this, the fastest-growing welfare program in the entire government, we should have taken the opportunity to provide meaningful work reform requirements, especially for able-bodied adults, as we passed in the U.S. House.”

Representative Lynn Jenkins, who represents the Second District, said she voted against the bill because it cost too much and failed to achieve regulatory reform for farmers.

One of her main concerns: a new $20 million catfish inspection office at the Agriculture Department that has been the source of criticism by a number of lawmakers because it duplicates a cheaper existing inspection office at the Food and Drug Administration. Critics said the office, created in the 2008 farm bill at the request of Southern lawmakers from catfish-producing states, was created to keep out catfish from countries such as Vietnam, a potential violation of international trade laws.

Representative Mike Pompeo, from the state’s Fourth District, said his no vote was a result of his opposition to provisions in the new farm bill that would create trade and regulatory burdens for the state’s livestock producers. Meat and poultry producers are opposed to language that requires retailers to list the country of origin of meat.

“Last year I voted in favor of a farm bill that was not perfect, but a step forward,” Mr. Pompeo said. “Voting against this bill was not a easy decision, but I believe it reflects a step backwards to the old Washington of pet projects, reckless spending and harmful regulation.”

Representative Kevin Yoder, from the Third District, did not say why he opposed the bill.

In the end, the Kansas delegation vote did little to affect the outcome of the farm bill’s passage. It passed comfortably, 251 to 166.

Mr. Baccus said farmers held no ill will toward the delegation.

“It was a difference of opinion on this one piece of legislation,” he said. “We will still work with them to promote the interest of the state’s farmers.”

Landrieu Patriarch Talks About Family’s Political Prospects

In an interview with Moon Landrieu, the former New Orleans mayor, for Friday’s article about the fortunes of his political family business in Louisiana, the family’s patriarch weighed in on the family’s prospects. His son, Mayor Mitch Landrieu of New Orleans, has a Democratic primary on Saturday and his daughter, Senator Mary Landireu, also a Democrat, is facing a grueling re-election effort later this year in increasingly Republican Louisiana.

“The fact that they are running within a year of one another is not entirely new to us, what is a little different is the nature of the opposition in Mary’s campaign at this time, which is the totally negative PAC money that has started so early to mischaracterize her,” he said, referring to a deluge of ads underwritten by the billionaire conservative activists Charles and David Koch. “Because they keep feasting on one aspect of her voting record and that is the Obamacare act.”

He acknowledged Mr. Obama’s unpopularity across the state, saying the president “has had a couple of bad moments” and fretted that it increased the degree of difficulty of his daughter’s re-election. He expressed less worry about any spillover from a rumored Republican plot to stir up anti-Landrieu sentiment among blacks in the mayor’s race into his daughter’s contest down the road.

“If you know our history on race going back to the 1960s, we have always had a very solid good relationship with the African American community,” he said. After pausing to accept a kiss from another daughter, Melanie, named after a character in Gone With the Wind, Moon shook his head. “I have at times said ‘Mary, come on home girl, there’s another life out here.’”

There is a reason politics is the life Mary and Mitch know. A half century ago, Moon stood in Ella Brennan’s kitchen and made the case to her then-husband, a political consultant, as to why he was uniquely suited to run for mayor.

“Back then the city was like a Pousse-café,” said Ms. Brennan, referring to a layered cocktail of rainbow colored alcohols. Now the 88-year-old grand dame of New Orleans restaurants and matriarch of another of the city’s great - and at times feuding - families, she added, “We felt Moon was the man who could really mix it.”

Since then, Ms. Brennan has seen the Landrieu family rise and has thrown countless parties for them at her stately Garden District home next to her famed Commander’s Palace restaurant. She has lent Mary her house for functions and seen Mitch serenade George W. Bush at a post-Katrina party and sing the Ave Maria at the funeral of Representative Lindy Boggs, her frequent Sazerac drinking buddy. (“I saw them lunching at Commander’s one day,” James Carville said of the women, “and told my daughter to go to the table and genuflect.”)

Mr. Carville has played a significant role in launching the career of the similarly bald mayor, who is a former lieutenant governor with big ambitions and possible designs on the governorship â€" or something more. Mitch’s father served as President Carter’s onetime housing secretary, and his supporters see a potential role in Washington for Mitch, too.

Asked if he would serve out his term if re-elected, Mitch said, “Let me answer your question for a minute.” He then spoke for 2 minutes 47 seconds about having the best job on earth, knowing who he is, catching the city from falling off a cliff, what went wrong in 1960, his “run to the fire” governing style, the new airport he was building, “the younger generation of New Orleaneans,” and “multidimensional” goals. “At the end of the day I think the future is going to win out,” Mitch concluded.

Asked again if he would serve out his term he said: “The answer is I will. Now, in politics you can never say never” and added “To speculate what could happen in Washington or not, who the heck knows! It would have to be something really really dramatic for me to interrupt.”

“Like something really good?” he was interrupted.

“Really really good,” he said. “Really good.”

That healthy sense of self also allows the mayor to say such things as “I am the symbol of New Orleans catching herself turning herself around and going in the right direction.”

But while there are indeed clear signs of progress in a city devastated by Hurricane Katrina, the mayor also still struggles with high crime rates, blight and blatant inequality. The pousse-café Ella Brennan spoke of his father stirring is still not entirely mixed. In the Tremé neighborhood just outside the French Quarter, a pink graffiti scrawl reads “School’s Out Forever” across a dilapidated junior high school’s “Have A Happy Sum er” sign. Downtown, drivers pass under yellow billboards reading “Thou Shalt Not Kill.” Attendees of a mayoral forum Wednesday night in the Katrina devastated Lower Ninth Ward swerved around potholes as deep as ditches.

But electorally speaking at least, one of the kids is probably all right. At the forum, Mitch, the middle child of the Landrieu clan, sat next to a candidate who pleaded with the crowd to “Google me.” The mayor instead made his pitch for continuing to move forward as one city and noted all the federal assistance New Orleans had received during his tenure. All at once, he was campaigning for his older sister.

“We have to give credit to Senator Landrieu for this,” he said.