A routine Senate budget hearing turned into a public scolding as a prominent backer of the health care overhaul warned that a lack of public information could cause a âtrain wreckâ as the lawâs implementation moves forward.
Senator Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana and chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, grilled the health and human services secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, during a hearing on Wednesday about the administrationâs plans to educate the public about benefits. With the enrollment period for insurance exchanges set to begin Oct. 1, Mr. Baucus said that citizens, especially small businesses, had âno idea what to do.â
He said he gave a âfailing gradeâ to the administrationâs public information efforts.
âIâm concerned that lack of clear information is leading to misconceptions and misinformation, and people generally dislike what they donât understand,â Mr. Baucus said, citing a March poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation showing that high proportions of Americans had misconceptions about the lawâs provisions.
The Kaiser poll showed that 40 percent of respondents believe erroneously that the law creates a government panel to make end-of-life decisions for Medicare recipients, and that 57 percent think it includes a public insurance option.
The Health and Human Services Department has pledged a major outreach effort this fall around the exchanges.
A finding in the Kaiser poll that Mr. Baucus did not specifically mention was that 40 percent of respondents had an unfavorable view of the law, compared with 37 percent favorable.
âI just see a huge train wreck coming down,â Mr. Baucus said. âYou and I have discussed this many times, and I donât see any results yet.â
Ms. Sebelius responded, âWe certainly take outreach and education very, very seriously.â However, Mr. Baucus, who faces a potentially difficult re-election battle in 2014, appeared exasperated when she was unable to provide specific benchmarks or details on planned efforts.
As chairman of the finance committee, Mr. Baucus was instrumental in securing the lawâs passage in 2010. He remains a strong proponent, a spokeswoman said.
âHe still thinks itâs a great law, and he just is very intent on seeing it implemented correctly and making sure that all the benefits are communicated to people thoroughly,â said Meaghan Smith, a committee aide.