6:09 p.m. | Updated
Will the bipartisan group of eight senators hoping to overhaul the nation’s immigration laws meet their unofficial deadline of introducing legislation by the end of this week
Well, that depends on who you ask.
Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona and a member of the group, said he thought they could produce legislation by the end of the week.
“We don’t have that many differences that need to be resolved and we need to get moving, we need to get it over to the Judiciary Committee so that they can be a part of the process,†Mr. McCain said. “There’s a time for everything, you either get it done or you don’t. Now is the time to get it done as quickly as possible.â€
Mr. McCain seemed to echo comments that Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York and a member of the group, made this weekend on the CBS News program “Face the Nation.â€
“All of us have said that there will be no agreement until the eight of us agree to a big, specific bill, but hopefully we can get that done by the end of the week,†Mr. Schumer said Sunday on the show. “There have been kerfuffles along the way, but each one of those thus far has been settled.â€
Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate and a member of the group, similarly said he was “hoping to†have legislation by the end of the week.
“We’re hoping to have an agreement soon,†he said. “There still remains the element of drafting it, which takes a lot of time.â€
Mr. Durbin said that it was possible the group would reach an agreement in principle by the end of the week, but without all of the legislative language written â€" not to mention time for members to review it â€" he said the group would have decided whether or not to hold off until they had a complete bill to present. (Mr. McCain said the group would not unveil anything until they had all of the legislative language written.)
Other members of the group were even more circumspect. Senator Jeff Flake, Republican of Arizona, would only say, “We’re getting there,†but would not reveal a specific timeline.
And Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, would only say that he expected legislation “sooner rather than later.â€
“I can’t tell you on a certain date, but I’m very optimistic it will be soon,†Mr. Graham said. “Some things are yet to be done but we’re just about there. I feel optimistic we’re going to get here soon.â€
Though the exact timing of the roll out is still up in the air, a Senate aide with knowledge of the negotiations said that the Senate Judiciary Committee will likely mark up the bill the week of May 6. (Another aide with knowledge of the talks said that, with bipartisan support, the mark up could even earlier, by the end of April.)
“The senators had a good discussion this with Senator Leahy this afternoon,†said the aide. “We are optimistic that we will be able to introduce legislation soon. Chairman Leahy has agreed to hold a hearing as soon as possible after the legislation is introduced, and has promised to have unlimited debate and amendments during the committee mark-up. Assuming Republican members push for as much time as possible, the committee debate will last through the next recess, giving plenty of time for public debate and review.â€
A go-ahead on the broad deal seems to hinge on an agreement between farm workers and growers over a visa program that would offer an expedited path to legal status. Though the talks about farmworkers stalled last week, the bipartisan group of senators returned to Congress this week feeling more optimistic. And Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California who has been spearheading the side-negotiations on the agricultural worker program, said Tuesday that she expected a deal on her portion of the legislation within 24 hours.
As the status of immigration legislation in the Senate remained unclear, two House members â€" Representative Michael McCaul, Republican of Texas and chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, and Representative Candice Miller, Republican of Michigan and chairwoman of the House Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security â€" and Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas, joined together to introduce their own legislation to secure the country’s borders.
Their bill would implement specific metrics and measurements to gauge whether the nation’s borders are becoming more secure.
“The Border Security Results Act of 2013 ensures that border security will be realized,†Mr. McCaul said in an e-mail statement. “This legislation compels the use of taxpayer-owned technology to gain situational awareness of our borders so that we can finally see what we’re missing, and doing so will allow us to develop measures to gauge progress. For too long, we have approached border security backwards - by throwing resources at the problem, to plug the holes on our borders without a comprehensive plan to tactically distribute those resources.â€
Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida and a member of the bipartisan group, has remained the one wild card throughout the negotiations, recently sounding very public notes of caution when it comes to any immigration legislation. On Wednesday, he is set to brief his fellow Republican senators at their weekly steering lunch on where the legislation stands so far.
Alex Conant, a spokesman for Mr. Rubio, said that the senator is eager to see any legislation he signs onto go through a full committee process.
“Senator Rubio has said from the outset that we will not rush this process, and that begins at the committee level,†Mr. Conant said. “The Judiciary Committee must have plenty of time to debate and improve the bipartisan group’s proposal, so it’s good that senators and the public will have weeks to study this proposal before the Judiciary committee will mark it up. Senator Rubio will be requesting that his Senate colleagues arrange multiple public hearings on the immigration bill. We believe that the more public scrutiny this legislation receives, the better it will become.â€